Hug spelt backwards is “guh” and with which theorist thinker would one associated such a vocable? “guh” a la Foucault. “guh” a la Lacan.

Kristevean guh. Deleuzian guh. I wonder if Chun gets it…

If Roscharch is to projecting and getting it is to extraction, where is the productive double bind of the classic schiz-analytic stance? Either/or or and/and/and !!